Which of your segments can you actually prove?

A proof point is a single verifiable claim tied to its source: what changed, by how much, for whom, and how you know. Not a benefit statement and not an adjective. A usable proof point survives a sceptical reader asking where the number came from. An unusable one collapses on that question, which is why phrases like significantly faster signal a figure that was never there.

Four things per segment, because those are the four ways a proof point fails. Whether a published story exists at all, whether the customer is named, whether it contains a figure the customer stated themselves, and whether someone in that segment would take a reference call. A segment scoring four out of four is one you can genuinely sell into on evidence.

Because a buyer only cares about proof that resembles their own situation. 6sense's 2025 study of around 4,000 B2B buyers found buying groups average 11 members across different roles, so a single story cannot serve all of them, and a story from a different industry serves none of them. Ten case studies concentrated in one segment leave you unarmed everywhere else, which a total count hides and a coverage map exposes.

No. The whole tool runs in your browser. Nothing you type is transmitted, logged or saved, and there is no email wall. That is deliberate: you can screenshot the result or share it with a colleague without anything being captured.

Because an unnamed proof point cannot be checked, and a reader who cannot check one claim tends to discount the rest. A Fortune 500 manufacturer is a category, not a reference. That said, an honest anonymous story with a real figure still beats a named one with a vague claim, so treat naming as a strong preference rather than an absolute rule.

Publish it without one rather than reaching for adjectives. Words like significant and dramatic are read as a missing figure, which is worse than an openly qualitative story told in the customer's own words. A specific description of what changed carries more weight than a superlative standing where a number should be.

Most teams find one strong segment and several empty ones, which is the normal shape rather than a failure. Proof accumulates where selling has been easiest, so the gaps usually sit in the segments a company is trying to expand into — precisely where evidence would do the most work.

Interview one customer in that segment and publish what they say. The obstacle is rarely the writing. Uplift Content's 2024 survey of 115 SaaS customer marketers found each case study took roughly 12.7 hours of active work but about two months of elapsed time, with the blockers being finding a willing customer, identifying metrics and getting approval. Shortening the capture is what changes the number, which is what StoryVoice is built to do.